Johnson hits the stand!

Find attached, the court transcripts from my testimony in the Gina Tarvin Lawsuit.

Notice one thing… The plaintiff has the burden of proof to substantiate that any claim, in her filing is a “Threat”.

She NEVER met the burden of proof once.

My attorney is heading back to court on June 6th, 2018 to have a discussion about political speech, vindictiveness, lies, falsehoods, perjury and all things related to lawsuits such as these, commonly known as SLAPP suits. We will find out if Tarvin gets to fork out more money on the 6th.

If the judge decides to award her the best actress in a comedy Oscar, I have have already established different methods of recovering my attorneys fees that Ms. Tarvin will hate even worse.

More on SLAPP Suits.

In the meantime, enjoy my testimony in this case… I have published the PDF Below.

If anybody would like a copy of the full court transcript… just let me know and I will get you one…

Hope you enjoy reading my testimony as much as I enjoyed giving it!.

Click the link below for all the fun!

Chuck Johnson Testimony in Tarvin Hearing

Advertisements

The Tarvin Files.

Gina Clayton- Tarvin went on a Kamikaze mission, to shut me up, with a perjury filled document, obviously prepared with the help of co- conspirators, in what is often referred to as a SLAPP suit. ( Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation).

She tried to dress it up in an ill fitting suit of victim-hood and lies, per her usual modus operandi.

On May 9th, 2018, I appeared in court to defend an attempt by Gina Clayton-Tarvin to obtain a permanent restraining order against me for a variety of charges, many of which had to have been provided to her by co-conspirators, due to the fact that Clayton-Tarvin had me “Blocked” on Facebook and would be unable to see my commentary.

Tarvin also filed a companion suit, alleging “Harassment”, “Libel per se”, & “Intentional infliction of emotional distress”.

Some of her “Charges” of “Threats” in the TRO were beyond ridiculous, and blatantly amounted to identifiable perjury. Her initial filing was filled with intentionally crafted inflammatory language, designed to obtain the desired result, which was a Temporary Restraining Order.

In one instance, she went so far as to scrape a comment from a Facebook conversation between myself and 2 friends,and frame it as a “threat” against her.

The level of disingenuous evil was on full display, and easy to identify.

She attempted to rush me into court with little time to prepare.

I complied with all of the requirements of the TRO, including surrendering my firearms to he HBPD for temporary storage pending the outcome of the hearing.

Tarvin called all of the media outlets and crony journalists that she has on speed dial, to trumpet the fact that she had obtained a TRO.

Most people fail to realize that the defendant. in an attempt to obtain a TRO has no chance to rebut the claims until the hearing date.

The Judge is always forced to err on the side of caution, and since Tarvin’s intentionally inflammatory claims painted me as a psychotic madman, Judge Timothy Stafford granted Tarvin’s request for a TRO.

It’s kind of sad that our justice system has a mechanism for people to remove 1st and 2nd amendment rights without due process, for even a short period, while the defendant awaits his or her hearing date, but it is what is.

I suppose it’s always better to err on the side of caution, so I bear no malice against the Judge, who was hoodwinked into granting the TRO, one which Tarvin promptly used as a media device to paint herself as a terrified “Victim” ,

And one which was promptly reported on by her hack for hire journalist friends, such as Gabriel San Roman at the OCWeakly and Priscilla Vega of the LA Times/ Daily Pilot and Alma Fausto of the OCRegister. ( I was surprised that they did not hand the piece to Tarvin’s Lapdog, Greg Mellen.)

Since I am not stupid enough to walk into combat without ammunition, body armor and reinforcements , I requested and was granted a continuance from the original April 18 Hearing date to May 9th, 2018.

I was able to study the filing in depth and rebut it so that my attorney could comprehend what seemed a bizarre case to begin with, and begin formulating a solid beatdown to the insane claims presented in Tarvin’s filing.

On May 9th, I prevailed in this sad, pathetic episode, and the Judge denied Tarvin’s request.

The following morning, she withdrew her Civil harassment case. That was probably a wise move, because it was so weak, that her attorneys must have confronted her afterwards and advised her that they would refuse to represent her, probably fearing sanctions from the Judge for a ” false filing” which would subject them to penalties from the Courts.

Either that, or Tarvin simply realized that the jig was up, and that she would get legally annihilated by my attorneys and myself, and be on the hook for thousands more dollars.

I was actually surprised to see her pull the suit so fast, since Tarvin is so arrogant and believes that she is somehow anointed, that I was convinced she would be willing to enter the Colosseum for another Gladiator show, one that would result in a quick and brutal loss to the pathological liar that is Gina Clayton- Tarvin.

Find below the documents related to this case. I will list them chronologically by name and purpose.


Tarvin’s Initial filing of a civil suit, unredacted:

Summons and complaint – Tarvin vs. Johnson


Tarvins Filing for a Temporary Restraining Order, unredacted;

TRO – Filing Tarvin Vs. Johnson


I complied with the Courts demand that I surrender my firearms until the hearing date, and filed a ch800 form with the courts, losing my second amendment rights to a perjury filled sworn declaration by Tarvin.

Property Reciept – Firearms- HBPD


The TRO Hearing date allowed me little time to prepare a response so I filed for a continuance:

Tarvin Vs. Johnson – Continuance


My attorney asked me to rebut the filing. The Filing consists of a series of Amendments at the end of Tarvins TRO filing. Find Below my analysis and rebuttal for review by my legal counsel in order of response to the amendments. Every word I say, is absolutely true. These were prepared by myself in order to provide the context and truth to my counsel.

These documents….represent the absolute truth of the case. I challenge anybody to demonstrate otherwise.

Rebuttal to attachment 3b

Rebuttal to attachment 4

Rebuttal to 7a and 7b

Rebuttal to 7a 4 and 5

Proof of any claims in these rebuttals is available upon request. Also, if you care to challenge what I assert…..

email me at : surfcitysledgehammer@gmail.com


We filed CPRA Requests with the City of Huntington Beach Police Department.

2018-04-17.PRA Request to City of HB Copy


We finally obtained the following documents in return, indicating Tarvin knew full well, that her charges were not deemed credible threats. She even tried to use a joke that I wrote to Mayor Mike Posey, who was visiting John Moorloch, asking him not to consider endorsing lunatic John Briscoe, as if that had anything to do with anything…

tarvin_emails


My attorney began crafting our formal response, which was submitted to the court.

Response to Request for Restraining Order


My attorney also prepared an Anti Slapp filing, and submitted it to the courts, which will be heard by Judge Timothy Stafford in June…. The same Judge Tarvin Called “Reckless” after her beatdown. Thanks Gina!

No doubt Stafford will take that comment into account when he decides whether or not to whack you over the head for thousands more in legal fees in June 2018, dumb ass…

Tarvin Vs. Johnson Anti-SLAPP Motion


In a nutshell, The Judge realized Tarvin was a nutcase.

He blasted her attorneys for bringing a weak case to the court, and gave me a beatdown because… you know…”We should all be nice..” lol.

Verdict? Case Dismissed. Just as I knew it would be.


The Following day, Gina Clayton- Tarvin withdrew her even more ridiculous civil suit. Since I am preparing to leave to go out, I will return to finish this piece, with the breakdown of the civil suit, annihilated line by line, (Just so Gina Tarvin will know the level of damage she would have sustained, had her attorneys not told her to drop the case, either because they knew it was too weak or weaker than the TRO, or they, like many people, had grown sick of her lies, and were too embarrassed to represent such a head case, under threats of an Order To Show Cause why the civil “harassment” suit should not be dismissed out of hand for false filing, and both attorneys and client sanctioned and fined.


Nice Try Gina… better luck next time.

Your Participation Trophy is in the mail… and remember…

“It’s all for the kids…”

ImageCompositionServlet


Gina Clayton-Tarvin Sued me and all I got was this stupid T-shirt…

stupid tshirt.jpg

In an absolute kamikaze mission, Gina Clayton- Tarvin strapped herself into a Baka bomb, destined for a one way attack into legal oblivion.

Pulling down the shoulders straps in her Baka Bomb, Tarvin walked in to court May 9th to do battle with me and my supporters.

She pulled the release lever and launched her mission… one from which she was guaranteed no return.

images

Tarvin need not learn how to land.

There was no returning from this attempt to shut down HBSledgehammer and that “Psycho” Chuck Johnson.

Desperate people take desperate measures. Somehow, despite the crocodile tears and the Oscar worthy performance, Tarvin ran into a wall of cannon fire, once my wingman Chris Epting hit the stand.

Epting fought off a perplexed judge, then managed to unload a brutal volley that left Tarvins Baka bomb smoking, spinning and falling.

He was quickly followed on the stand by myself, and despite my insane effort to control my rage, no doubt some of it managed to show thru and I simply proceeded to dismantle her case, line by line, exhibit by exhibit.

I pumped a few more rounds from my cannon at her attorneys and her aircraft and banked hard right as Norm Westwell flew tail positon and brought up the rear…Westwell put even more holes in her flaming, falling aircraft.

My attorney then managed to hit her with a massive wall of first amendment flak from which she could not escape.

Her suicide mission ended as it should… with her weapon falling harmlessly into the sea, with all of us cackling and laughing about what a crappy pilot she was, and how easy it was to shoot her down.

Her high command must have seen that that they were up against far harder targets than Tarvin had let on, and promptly ended the second phase of Tarvins offensive and dismissed her ridiculous Civil “Harassment” suit the following morning.

The Judge actually chastised Tarvin’s attorneys for the terrible case they presented, gave my attorney a subtle beatdown for his lack of prep and calling me “Mr. Wilson”… ( promptly corrected to Mr. Johnson… told me to ” Just be nice…” or some shit like that..He apparently wasn’t a fan of my dark humor, nor my foul language…

Really.

He then informed Tarvin and Myself that he didn’t want to see either myself nor Tarvin in his courtroom ever again… so Gina… behave yourself.

I won’t. Not a chance in hell.

But Gina, you had better behave amd stop it with the bullshit lawsuits… No doubt Stafford will remember you and just tell the bailiff to get this lying sack of shit out of my courtroom before my head explodes from having to listen to your lies and tales of victim-hood.

Anybody out there think that I’m going to play nice?…. Bwhahahahah!

Not a chance. It only get worse from here on out. Briscoe, Souders, Singer.. get out there and start taking your swings in the on deck circle.

You are all part of the problem. a problem I’m now even more dedicated than ever to solve.

Think of it as a public service.

My next release will include all of the court documents related to this case. Judge for yourself.

Develop a clear picture of what just went down may 9th. You are going to have to wait while I structure it perfectly, in chronological fashion, so that you develop a solid understanding.

But by the time you are finished reading what will no doubt be a long piece, you will have all the tools required to understand Gina Clayton- Tarvin…. and why I fight so damn hard against her… so damn hard, that she tried to sue me out of desperation, to shut me up.

The Sledgehammer counteroffensive has been in the planning stages for quite a while now.

The advisors are quietly amassing the battle plan. It involves numerous pending battles.

Perjury. Conspiracy. Malicious Prosecution. Defamation.

And yeah… intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Ever read the “Art of War” by Sun Tzu? I have.

It sits on my nightstand. I read it a lot. I highly recommend it to anyone. The man is a genius.


“Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”

“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win

In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity”

“Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment — that which they cannot anticipate.”

“Be extremely subtle even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent’s fate.”

Sun Tzu~ The Art of War.


Gina, whoever convinced you to walk into a minefield with a blindfold on, did you no favors.

You and I will be intrinsically linked for life… or at least as long as your working career… you will see that deduction check after check for “Garnishment”.

And I will save it all in a special account so that my son and i can surf Costa Rica for two weeks straight once he hits sixteen. Thanks.

See you again in court soon. And don’t worry…. It wont be C-66 with Stafford. You can try out the waterworks on a whole new judge.

But no doubt, the result, will be much the same.

See you at the next OVSD meeting!

Time for truth…

Im decompressing this morning….enjoying a smoke and a cup of coffee at my favorite table to write at over at Harrys… I have much to say about my court battle yesterday…Trust me…its coming….i just need to settle in with my laptop and it will flow like water…be patient readers…i promise a world of fun!

Tarvin apparently yanked her bullshit “defamation” suit…no matter…shes still going to pay my attorneys fees…

And if Ms. Clayton -Tarvin thinks thats the end of this…think again Gina. Im in discussions with a gentleman who worked in the DAs office for 20+ years and identified the elements of perjury in your filing and offered me a knowing smile. Then comes comes malicious prosecution. Then we move on to a “real” defamation case, before closing with a intentional infliction of emotional distress.

I think its time for truth Gina. All the crocodile tears in the world won’t save you now….lawyer up bitch.

HBSledgehammer University: Online Syllabus-ETHICS 104 – SLAPP Lawsuits.

Welcome to HBSledgehammer University:

Online Education. ETHICS 104- SLAPP Lawsuits.

Professor: Miss Smith. 714-536-9303 email: mssmith@HBsledgehammer.edu

Introduction.

We have prepared this syllabus for your use.

In this class, we will cover the fundamentals of what constitutes a SLAPP Lawsuit.

Untitled

Next we will cover why SLAPP Suits are filed Including:

  • Attempts to silence political critics
  • Attempts to intimidate political critics
  • Confusion over the intent or direction of a statement.
  • Inability of a public figure or business to accept the fact that they are disliked
  • Inability of a public figure or business to effectively accept open criticism
  • Paranoia
  • Mental Illness
  • Being a total asshole
  • And Finally, Bat Shit Craziness

The class will then review important case law pertaining to SLAPP suits including:

  • HUSTLER MAGAZINE, INC. V. FALWELL 485 U.S. 46 (1988)
  • Scott v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 277, 288.
  • Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. v. Paladino (2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 294, 308.
  • Barrett v. Rosenthal, 40 Cal. 4th 33, 41 n.4 (2006
  • Ampex v. Cargle, 128 Cal. App. 4th 1569, 1576 (2005)
  • Franklin v. Dynamic Details, Inc. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 375, 385. 
  • Chaker v. Mateo (2012) 209 CA4th 1138, 1148.
  • Ghafur v. Bernstein (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1230,1238.

Finally, we will cover ANTI SLAPP law Including:

  • The severe financial consequences of filing a bogus lawsuit
  • The embarrassment of having your ass handed to you in open court
  • The potential for the intended “Victim” of your SLAPP suit to mock you mercilessly
  • The feeling of abject failure resulting from having your SLAPP suit tossed by a Judge within minutes of reading the complaint.
  • And a recap of the additional fees and costs that the Plaintiff will pay as a result of a gleeful attorney for the defendant taking the case on contingency.